Welcome to the Podiatry Arena forums

You are currently viewing our podiatry forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view all podiatry discussions and access our other features. By joining our free global community of Podiatrists and other interested foot health care professionals you will have access to post podiatry topics (answer and ask questions), communicate privately with other members, upload content, view attachments, receive a weekly email update of new discussions, access other special features. Registered users do not get displayed the advertisements in posted messages. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our global Podiatry community today!

  1. Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Have you considered the Clinical Biomechanics Boot Camp Online, for taking it to the next level? See here for more.
Dismiss Notice
Have you liked us on Facebook to get our updates? Please do. Click here for our Facebook page.
Dismiss Notice
Do you get the weekly newsletter that Podiatry Arena sends out to update everybody? If not, click here to organise this.

Are home visits patients getting more complicated

Discussion in 'Practice Management' started by lottie, May 10, 2014.

Tags:
  1. lottie

    lottie Active Member


    Members do not see these Ads. Sign Up.
    I just wondered if other podiatrists are also finding that home visits are getting more complicated . I am finding that I am seeing more patients in their late 80's and 90's
    still living at home requiring home visits with much more complicated health problems. I am finding that I am getting more high risk patients that are more prone to ulceration. I am finding that when I do have problems with ulcerations and require dressing support I am getting less support from overloaded local district nursing teams. I am finding treatments are taking longer and I am the one that is ending up doing the dressings!
     
  2. Podess

    Podess Active Member

    Yes, because the NHS keeps discharging more and more into the community.

    This is privatisation by the back door.
     
  3. W J Liggins

    W J Liggins Well-Known Member

    Sadly, it's inevitable that with an aging population increasing pathology and polypharmacy will become, almost, the norm. However, look at it from a positive point of view, increased time = increased income; increased dressings = increased income.

    All the best

    Bill Liggins
     
  4. Yes, home visit patients are becoming more complicated. As a Registered Nurse my Practice was set up 27 years ago to service this exact population, and has done so very successfully ever since. I think its great that elderly and disabled people can stay in their own home as long as they can, because that is what they want. Life in a Rest Home is not appealing for many.

    These clients do not have endless money, so doing dressings for more money is not best practice. I liaise directly with Public Health and Practice Nurses, as part of my Collaborative Practice commitment, and find dressings are done satisfactorily.

    Another plus is that these nurses, plus Carers, plus organizations like Diabetes Center and Aged Concern, refer people to me so their needs can be met.

    Podiatrists could work more closely with Registered Nurses in a Collaborative way, to the benefit of all concerned. I refer clients to Podiatrists for care such as wedge resection, they refer to me for home visits. Defending ones patch is not the focus: best care for the patient is the focus.
     
  5. ydr 1973

    ydr 1973 Member

    I am a private practitioner and I have been visiting a patient with severe oedema and vascular insufficiency , as a result she presents with longstanding ulceration on her legs which the district nurse treats, and subungal ulceration which I have been treating on a weekly basis .Call me daft but I do feel I have a duty of care to her as a regular patient of mine and I have not been charging her for the redressings just for her routine treatments every 6wks or so , ( she is a pensioner on limited resources after all )Try as I may, but the district nurses were not interested in her feet at all and most of their visits they did not check her dressings and if they did they just said everything was fine when they weren't.
    I'm glad to say since then this lady has had undergone angioplasty and her foot problems have improved dramatically .
     
  6. mburton

    mburton Active Member

    Having discovered an interest in woundcare when I was a student, I went down the NHS career path where I could suggest review appts for wounds without the patient's (or indeed my own) financial status being a consideration.

    Ydr, although I can understand your motive in doing the redressings for free, you weren't really helping your patient - it was the person who organised the vascular consult which led to the angioplasty that has really (as you admit yourself) made the difference in this case. Unless it is for a well-defined charitable event, working for free will push your business down the tubes and you to 'burn-out'.

    Lottie, you don't say whether you work for the NHS or in private practice. It's frustrating when you can't get the support you need - there's only so much one person can do.
    The health care system functions a bit differently in Scotland where I work, and as in everything in life, examples of good and not -so -good practice can be found. My clinic is in a community hospital and for my domiciliary caseload I liaise with the community nursing team here very productively and they include foot dressings as part of their normal caseload. We do joint visits and/ or discuss further care of high risk patients, I do any sharp debridement required and can refer on eg to orthotics, vascular, diabetes team etc etc as required.
    Occasionally they will also help out with home dressings for my nail surgery patients who can neither cannot do it themselves nor manage up to the practice nurse to have it done - eg patients with severe mobility issues or dementia.

    We are all, of course extremely busy, but personally I would be much more worried ,as a publicly funded service, if we weren't, ! The NHS is a huge target and hence very easy to criticize. With an aging population(own goal?) and an ever-increasing opportunity to incorporate improved drugs, equipment and procedures within a limited budget, it will inevitably never please everyone. We hope for strong leadership and robust processes, but the very fact that the deliverers of the service are human - kind, empathic, caring, helpful - also can mean they are fallible - impatient, uninformed, unwell, preoccupied, overburdened.

    My own experience, as an employee (and of course as a user) for over 20 years has been a positive one overall and and we concern ourselves with trying to find solutions to the many and varied problems that come our way from whatever direction!
     
  7. John Danof

    John Danof Welcome New Poster

    I must ask how does one earn more money by spending more time with a patient exactly, please feel free to inbox me
     
  8. W J Liggins

    W J Liggins Well-Known Member

    Your fees must reflect the time that you spend with your patient; hence > time > the fee.

    Bill Liggins
     
Loading...

Share This Page